Much gnashing of teeth and rending of garments is occuring over the results of Nielsen's study,
indicating, among other metrics,
that nearly two-thirds of people who have visited a blog don't know what a blog is. Not meaning to sound smug, but the
results make perfect sense and I'm not a bit surprised. Blogging, as a defined publishing genre, has always been more
important to bloggers than to blog readers. The value of blogging software is primarily that it offers an easy way to
update Websites. As such, it is in improvement over the traditional HTML/FTP creation and building process. But
visitors have no reason to notice that aministrative advantage. To them, a blog is just another frequently updated Web
site. Personal publishing not new; news publishing is not new; and the merger of the two as a genre isn't tectonic
enough to distinguish itself in the minds of readers. The fact that MSM distributes its content via RSS further muddies
the distinction between news sites and blogs.
Bloggers: Get over it. Blogging is of great value to us, because it simplifies back-end databasing that we are too
inept to master without a friendly front end. But to our visitors, the term "blog" needn't have any particular meaning.
Better for the industry, in fact, that it doesn't, because it keeps the focus on content quality. The Weblog, as a
genre, should not benefit from any special perception, and it shouldn't enjoy any privileged latitude. Blogging
platforms give us the means to stay as current as the maintream media sites. Now it's up to us to be as insightful,
articulate, and deserving of mainstream eyeballs.
Ignorance of Blogs Among Blog Readers
Reader Comments
(Page 1)3. A very good point and it's nice to hear it made.
Posted at 4:46AM on Dec 19th 2005 by Peter Nixey
4. The other third are probably bloggers reading each other's trackback links. Normal internet users couldn't really give a toss what a website calls itself, they want to know if it gives them something valuable.
Posted at 4:46AM on Dec 19th 2005 by David Russell
5. This article is nearly useless. Why not break out into some detail in your explanation of what a blog is?
Posted at 4:46AM on Dec 19th 2005 by Aaron
6. It's a bit of an oxymoron to write a blog on blogging that adds no value. Spend some time telling us what the 2/3 of the world don't know. Maybe you and the rest of us are part of that 67%?
Posted at 4:46AM on Dec 19th 2005 by Jose Mallabo








1. On the other hand Jason Calcanis wants Google to start recognising bloggers by having a 'search blogs' button.
I agree with you btw, rather than Jason. It's like users clicking on sponsored listings and not realising they are paid-for. Happens a lot.
But why start making distinctions? 99% of blogs aren't worth bothering with anyway. A dedicated blog search function on Google would only serve to highlight this.
Robert
Posted at 4:46AM on Dec 19th 2005 by robert